<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="hi">
	<id>https://bharatdiscovery.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%3ATimothyGvr</id>
	<title>सदस्य:TimothyGvr - अवतरण इतिहास</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://bharatdiscovery.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%3ATimothyGvr"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bharatdiscovery.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:TimothyGvr&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-25T13:37:22Z</updated>
	<subtitle>विकि पर उपलब्ध इस पृष्ठ का अवतरण इतिहास</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bharatdiscovery.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:TimothyGvr&amp;diff=369966&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>रविन्द्र प्रसाद: पन्ने को खाली किया</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bharatdiscovery.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:TimothyGvr&amp;diff=369966&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-09-01T05:12:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;पन्ने को खाली किया&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;hi&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← पुराना अवतरण&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;05:12, 1 सितम्बर 2013 का अवतरण&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l1&quot;&gt;पंक्ति 1:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;पंक्ति 1:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;The five forces model of Porter (1980) is a superb instrument to gauge industry attractiveness. Within the following, each of the five competitive forces will be analyzed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Risk of New Entrants &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In order to participate in the market, much money is needed. The least expensive alternative will be a chopper starting at 200.000 Euros to get a smaller aircraft. A classified program fees around one-million Euro's, product usage only. Furthermore, in order to work these programs, specialized knowledge is required. Finally it may be stated that popularity is of crucial importance within the off-shore access market. The end result of all of this is a large entrance obstacle what contributes to a low threat of new entrants. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Threat of substitutes: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Replacements of the classified system just like the helicopter and the jack-up system remain often found in the conservative off-shore oil and gas industry. Nevertheless the off-shore entry system features a competitive edge due to the fast installation on location.  So it will be concluded that risk of new and current alternatives is medium. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Negotiating place of buyers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Consumers generally speaking choose a secure means of overseas entry even at higher cost, thus price plays a part.  Switching costs are minimal, but consumers relate on personal experience. The negotiating position of customers is medium high, mainly because of the very few customers. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bargaining power of Suppliers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The amount of providers is bound. Resources are highly customized for devices. Each company offers only several pieces for your process but don't only depend on this market. Vertical integration is not interesting for the suppliers. Firstly, they'd still have to purchase too many parts, that makes it complicated and expensive. Subsequently, the off-shore entry market is much differentiated towards the kinds of the suppliers and demands specialized information. All in all, the arguments demonstrate that the bargaining power of manufacturers is high; a depends strongly on the supplier's performance. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Aggressive Rivalry: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The few companies in the offshore access sector build a framework as oligopoly. Though the firms face exit barriers. The company and the merchandise a provides are highly-specialized. The investments due to their products have become specific to this market. It is unlikely that firms exit the industry as a way to gain profit in yet another industry.  Therefore it is figured competitive rivalry is rather low. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Realization &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Anything taking into consideration, a currently has large attractiveness. Although it is extremely difficult to contend for new entrants because clients are price insensitive and materials are highly personalized. It's estimated that industry appeal may lessen. The explanation for this decline could be the introduction of substitutes like the off-shore access method. Hence the industry acts a developing market although the attraction of the industry will decline. E.g. [http://support.copy10.com/entries/22198935-Best-Approach-To-Reach-Off-shore-Oil-Gas check my source].&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key bharatkosh-hi_:diff:1.41:old-369907:rev-369966:php=table --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>रविन्द्र प्रसाद</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://bharatdiscovery.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:TimothyGvr&amp;diff=369907&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>TimothyGvr: 'The five forces model of Porter (1980) is a superb instrument to gauge industry attractiveness. Within the following, each of the five co...' के साथ नया पन्ना बनाया</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://bharatdiscovery.org/w/index.php?title=%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF:TimothyGvr&amp;diff=369907&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2013-08-31T16:34:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&amp;#039;The five forces model of Porter (1980) is a superb instrument to gauge industry attractiveness. Within the following, each of the five co...&amp;#039; के साथ नया पन्ना बनाया&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;नया पृष्ठ&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;The five forces model of Porter (1980) is a superb instrument to gauge industry attractiveness. Within the following, each of the five competitive forces will be analyzed. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Risk of New Entrants &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In order to participate in the market, much money is needed. The least expensive alternative will be a chopper starting at 200.000 Euros to get a smaller aircraft. A classified program fees around one-million Euro's, product usage only. Furthermore, in order to work these programs, specialized knowledge is required. Finally it may be stated that popularity is of crucial importance within the off-shore access market. The end result of all of this is a large entrance obstacle what contributes to a low threat of new entrants. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Threat of substitutes: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Replacements of the classified system just like the helicopter and the jack-up system remain often found in the conservative off-shore oil and gas industry. Nevertheless the off-shore entry system features a competitive edge due to the fast installation on location.  So it will be concluded that risk of new and current alternatives is medium. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Negotiating place of buyers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Consumers generally speaking choose a secure means of overseas entry even at higher cost, thus price plays a part.  Switching costs are minimal, but consumers relate on personal experience. The negotiating position of customers is medium high, mainly because of the very few customers. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Bargaining power of Suppliers &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The amount of providers is bound. Resources are highly customized for devices. Each company offers only several pieces for your process but don't only depend on this market. Vertical integration is not interesting for the suppliers. Firstly, they'd still have to purchase too many parts, that makes it complicated and expensive. Subsequently, the off-shore entry market is much differentiated towards the kinds of the suppliers and demands specialized information. All in all, the arguments demonstrate that the bargaining power of manufacturers is high; a depends strongly on the supplier's performance. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Aggressive Rivalry: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The few companies in the offshore access sector build a framework as oligopoly. Though the firms face exit barriers. The company and the merchandise a provides are highly-specialized. The investments due to their products have become specific to this market. It is unlikely that firms exit the industry as a way to gain profit in yet another industry.  Therefore it is figured competitive rivalry is rather low. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Realization &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Anything taking into consideration, a currently has large attractiveness. Although it is extremely difficult to contend for new entrants because clients are price insensitive and materials are highly personalized. It's estimated that industry appeal may lessen. The explanation for this decline could be the introduction of substitutes like the off-shore access method. Hence the industry acts a developing market although the attraction of the industry will decline. E.g. [http://support.copy10.com/entries/22198935-Best-Approach-To-Reach-Off-shore-Oil-Gas check my source].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>TimothyGvr</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>